J. Gregory Moxness’ Possible Foundation for a ToE Model
Please visit www.TheoryOfEverything.com for E8 Art Prints (for sale)
or TheoryOfEverything.spreadshirt.com for E8 Art Prints on t-shirts (for sale)

| E8Favorites.pdf |
A .pdf of “E8 Math, Science and Art” Gallery Exhibit Prints (for sale) from the e8Flyer |
| ToE.pdf | My latest paper (full detail of all latest work |
| e8Flyer.nbp |
This is a more complex version of the e8Viewer. It has a full suite of controls for the manipulation of hyper-dimensional data sets (like the highly symmetric E8). |
| VisibLie_E8.nbp | This is the E8Flyer with an added feature to select Lie Groups from a Dynkin Diagram Interface. This is a Mathematica “notebook player file” (.nbp) and can be played on the free Mathematica player. |
| auxData.m | Example auxiliary (random non-physics data) inFile |
| auxData.xls | Example auxiliary data input spreadsheet (called by auxData.m) |
| ece2.mht | Comparison of Lisi’s EPE and E8Viewer & E8Flyer |
| ToEnb.pdf | The same paper above validated w/Mathematica 6 |
| What time is it.pdf | A TheoryOfEverything in one .ppt slide |
| My Tools of the Trade | I modified FormCalc to work on WinTel Mathematica platforms |
| NewUnits.m | Mathematica’s Units.m with added conversions to the new ‘More Natural’ Units using a call to UNITS[] |
| NewPhysicalConstants.m | Mathematica’s PhysicalConstants.m organized w/priority for fundamental defined and measured vs. derived values – updated to 2006 CODATA |
| PhysicalConstantErrors.m | Added a Mathematica file to define fundamental measured physical constant std. errors w/priority for defined and smaller errors – updated to 2006 CODATA |
3 Comments to “.My ToE”
Write a comment
You need tologin.
[...] The Best Yet: "Theory of Everything." http://theoryofeverything.org/wordpress/?page_id=14 We are not alone! [...]
[...] Theoryofeverything.org [...]
Really beautiful and complex multifaceted pictures. Generaly, simplification is the better course when defining a TOE. No matter what you may see out there the more convoluted it is the less accurate.
If, at the bare-bones-level it doesn’t make sense and cannot be defined in a few succinct paragraphs then chances are it’s wrong.
Sincerely,
Michael Gary Jordan